Current Local Concerns and Updates
Harbor District Parking Lot Plan on North Burnham Strip
*(This is not an EGA initiative, yet it concerns us and EGA supports it so we are posting it here.)
Parking Lot Proposed on North Burnham Strip
How many of our residents actually have heard about this? It has already been sent out for bid. Harbor says it will be an “overflow” parking lot. Will there be boats, campers and/or tour buses parked there? How often is overflow actually needed? Lots of questions to ask about this. It is NOT a done deal. You can oppose this by writing to Supervisor Mueller and his aides and the Harbor District Commissioners.
Information:
Harbor District MCC presentation slides
coastside365 request for proposal
Request for proposal (RFP) doc
Recording of MCC meeting discussion
Harbor Staff Report Feb 19th meeting summary
Harbor District Board Meeting videos(nothing recent posted, most recent is 2022)
Send letters of concern to Supervisor Mueller and the Harbor District
Harbor District Commissioner contact link
Take Action link (contacts)
Eucalyptus Removal Petition?
🌲 Share Your Concerns About the Eucalyptus Removal Petition (HERE)
Research shows: Homes are most at risk from wind-driven embers, which can travel long distances—crossing rivers, highways, and even cleared firebreaks. While tree removal might reduce fire intensity, it doesn’t ensure a home will survive. A better strategy is to prioritize home hardening and carefully maintain the first 5 feet around structures—also known as Zone 0—to reduce ember ignition risk.
Let’s Take a Long-Term, Balanced Approach to Fire Safety AND Environmental Stewardship
A petition on NextDoor—now titled “Remove Neglected and Dangerous Eucalyptus Trees from the Unincorporated Coast”—was previously named “Remove Eucalyptus from the Unincorporated Coastside: Severe Fire Risk.”
Its revised language now claims it does not call for widespread removal, yet concerns remain in favor of broad tree removal in empty lots, the MidPen area, and it targets the tree medians of El Granada.
⚠️ What the Petition Overlooks
1. Fire Risk in Medians Is Already Managed
Median eucalyptus trees are not high priority per the (El Granada Wildfire Resiliency Scoping Project, San Mateo Resource Conservation District, June 2022).
Wide streets surrounding the medians act as firebreaks.
Grasses and limbs are cut annually by the Department of Public Works, and debris is cleared. As of 4/21/25 median grass was recently cut short and debris removed.
The trees provide a cooling effect for the neighborhood as the climate heats up.
2. Insurance Concerns Lack Supporting Data
Some adjacent homeowners report no issues with insurance related to the trees.
Improved maintenance—not removal—could address future risks.
3. Environmental Impacts
Tree removal may increase erosion and flooding, especially in lower areas.
Established trees support moisture retention, cooling, and wind protection—critical as the climate warms.
4. Wildlife Habitat and Ecosystem Loss
These medians provide habitat for birds of prey, many smaller birds, bats, insects, and migratory species.
Sudden removal would disrupt ecological balance and likely increase rat populations.
5. Loss of Community Identity and Lower Granada Park Space
The median trees are part of El Granada’s historic Burnham Plan and contribute to its unique character and park space.
✅ We Agree: Fire Safety Matters
Where fire breaks are inadequate, such as in Quarry Park or MidPen areas, we support improving them through responsible vegetation management—not blanket tree removal.
🌿 A Better Path Forward
Let’s build a thoughtful, long-term tree management plan that includes some of the petition suggestions and ours combined:
Public forums to discuss fire prevention, tree strategy, and climate stability
Professional oversight for tree maintenance, trimming, and removal when necessary
A budget and phased timeline prioritizing highest-risk areas
Replanting requirements for removed Eucalyptus trees where appropriate
Clear roles for County oversight and resident participation
Removal of legal obstacles to community-led planting on medians
📣 Take Action
Visit these pages for more resources:
Use our letter template to share your concerns with San Mateo County
Let’s protect El Granada’s canopy and climate stability while keeping our community safe.
Use the LETTER TEMPLATE AVAILABLE AT THIS LINK. You can copy and paste.
Sharing your concerns about the Petition with San Mateo County
Pesticides Sprayed on Public Lands/Parks
Eliminate/Reduce Pesticides on Public Lands/Parks in SMC
The County uses several types of glyphosate. It is known as RoundUp to most. Has been in the news for up to a billion now in total lawsuits due to harm it has caused people from exposure and use. The EPA was taken to court and forced to review glyphosate effects on endangered species. 93% of Endangered species were injured or killed including native plants.
Other toxic chemicals used on sensitive habitat, ironically in the name of habitat restoration, are Garlon 4 Ultra and Clearcast. Both show toxicity to wildlife including aquatic life and bees. Surfactants and spreaders used also contain PFAS (forever chemicals and POEAS which are 3450x more toxic than glyphosate)
*chemical references research page coming soon
————————————————————————-
How to support this cause?
Make the Parks and County aware of your concerns.
-Email the county
-Sign the petition
-take photos of spraying and the notifications posted, send to us and the County, and Parks (click link here for addresses on take action page).
They need to hear concerns from you. Use the Contact link at the bottom of the pages to reach us.